Scottish and Irish football could merge into 'Celtic League'

Today marks the first time the Republic of Ireland have faced England since the controversial riots in Dublin back in 1995. But the thirst for football in Ireland has never evaporated.

Similarly, Scotland are looking forward to a fixture at Wembley in August as the English FA clearly seem to be satisfying the demand for the English national team to battle its closest neighbours.

For English fans this kind of fixture adds a welcome pinch of spice to friendly games which are usually incredibly mundane and played against an experimental eleven of one of the world’s other elite nations. Irish and Scottish fans are likely to have a far greater interest in these matches.

The popularity of club football in England undoubtedly surpasses that of the national side at the present time. English football fans’ relationship with the club they support is far more intimate than the connection they have to their country, and crucially their club participate in many more enjoyable and meaningful games during the Premier League season and the Champions League.

Obviously a major tournament such as a World Cup will rekindle an Englishman’s affection for his national team but generally club comes first in the modern day. Unfortunately for Scottish and Irish fans, their league football is far inferior to that of England’s and thus they often have to rely on international games for big football occasions.

Celtic and Rangers are obviously the biggest clubs over the two nations and currently ply their trade in the Scottish football leagues. Rangers’ financial crisis has left them stuck in the lower depths of the Scottish leagues and thus Celtic have been left to steamroller domestic football. The 3-0 victory over Hibernian in the Scottish Cup Final epitomises how comfortably they were able to complete the domestic double this year.

By criticising the standard of Scottish I must point out that I am not criticising Celtic. I feel sorry for them. Celtic are a big club who are trying their best to outgrow the league they are in. They performed well in Europe this year but it is extremely unlikely they can push on from this with the inferior funding they get in comparison to England and other major football nations such as Spain, Italy and Germany.

The prospect of Celtic and Rangers joining the English Premiership has been mooted for some time now but the idea has never received enough momentum to be followed through. This is probably because, although the deal would benefit the Glasgow clubs, it would destroy Scottish domestic football whilst not transforming English football enough to justify such devastation.

The SPL is currently going through a transitional phase as a reform package was finally agreed this month to deliver a merged league body involving play-off games and better financial redistribution with regards to lower tier clubs. Hopefully this aids the improvement of Scottish football but perhaps the SFA could’ve looked at a more drastic plan to reinvent the league.

Whilst the SPL is comparatively weak to the rest of Europe, the leagues of Ireland and Northern Ireland are even poorer. Shamrock Rovers are the most successful team in domestic Irish football and have a stadium capacity of just 6,000. Compare that with Celtic Park’s 60,832 and of course the home of England’s most successful team, Manchester United’s Old Trafford which holds 75,765.

Irish football could certainly advantage from an affiliation with Scottish football, but perhaps the Scots could also benefit. The Scottish and Irish football associations clearly enjoy a decent relationship seen in their joint bid to host Euro 2008 and Euro 2020 (which involved Wales). Could something not have been arranged to plan a merge of the leagues?

The idea of a joint league has been put to FIFA before as the leagues of Belgium and Netherlands merging to create one division has been suggested. Interestingly this is already the case in women’s football which has the ‘BeNe League’ comprising of teams from both nations.

Belgium already has some relatively big clubs such as Anderlecht, Genk and Club Brugge. With FIFA ratification, merging these with teams in the Eredivise such as Ajax, PSV and Feyenoord could create a more competitive ‘Atlantic league’.

The Irish and Northern Irish leagues have no clubs of this stature and thus the merge could be even simpler. Club football in Ireland and Northern Ireland could be completely torn apart and rebuilt to have brand new teams representing cities such as Dublin, Ulster and Cork. These teams would undoubtedly have more appeal to the population of the area, tourists and football fans in general.

One has only to look over at football’s egg-shaped neighbours rugby, who created a ‘Celtic League’ for Irish, Scottish and Welsh teams in 2001. The competition, now known as ‘Pro 12’, has been extremely successful and more competitive, and has also now attracted Italian teams to compete in it.

I don’t want to blur the borders between domestic too much. Losing national leagues completely would be a travesty and a ‘European Super League’, which has been suggested before, would completely destroy the beauty of domestic football. Thus strict regulations and boundaries would have to be written by FIFA if a merged league was to be. But the idea of an Irish/Scottish league is an attractive one.

Television companies would be more interested, players would be more interested, and fans would be more interested. The money would increase dramatically and perhaps allow Scottish and Irish football fans to support a club which actually has the capacity to compete on Europe’s biggest stage.

Incorporating Welsh football clubs would be extremely unlikely as tempting the likes of Cardiff and Swansea from the glamour of English football would be impossible and thus there is little Wales could offer the league. Wales now occupies a tenth of the Premiership and so, although their domestic league is weak, they have club teams more than capable of satisfying supporter demand. Perhaps Welsh clubs could apply on a case-by-case basis to see if they could benefit the league.

Creating a ‘Celtic League’ in football would be a major job full of countless complications and hurdles to jump, but I have no doubt it would be a profitable venture. Scottish and Irish football both owe it to their own supporters to form a league which their population can finally be proud of.

Money talks in football, and who knows, someone with vision and big pockets could swoop in and make this happen. If Qatar can host the World Cup, anything can happen.

Follow me on Twitter @RichMaher93

Could it be an unpredictable contender who overthrows the Italians?

As the world champions, Italy, couldn’t even beat a Paraguay team missing their major threats in the form of Roque Santa Cruz and Oscar Cardozo, there’s sure to be a power shift this tournament and a new king. Although notoriously slow starters to major tournaments, Italy lacked speed and strength and with this world cup appearing to be one of stamina and endurance it’s unlikely they’ll progress too far in to the competition.
Paraguay took the lead in a tedious first half, which tends to have been the case with most games since the opening day. However, Italy did manage to net an equaliser from a set-piece with yet another goalkeeping mistake. As the ball was graciously floated in, the South American goalkeeper, Justo Villar flapped at his opportunity to catch and helplessly watched the infamous “Jabulani’” advance past his body and connect with Daniele De Rossi for an easy goal.
It was soon the turn of Group F’s other two contenders, New Zealand and Slovakia playing what was probably the least anticipated match of the entire tournament. With Australia, unfairly in my opinion, drafted into the Asian qualifying system for being ‘too good’ for their continent of Oceania, the Kiwis were presented with a timid route to the finals and with the emergence of deceitful “New Zealand internationals” born elsewhere, searching for world cup glory, such as Tommy Smith from England, who conveniently lived there for a while; they also had a whole new team.
The Slovakians duly took the lead with a rare attack on goal finishing with a converted header. More opportunities were scarce and you were left wondering how the likes of Sweden, the Czech Republic and even the Republic Of Ireland were left out of the tournament at the expense of this team of non-leaguers and fake national heroes. Romantically, the Danish, Winston Reid scored a header in injury time to gain New Zealand a point sending their team into hysterical celebrations. Celebrated as their ‘best result ever’ you have to wonder whether the system is flawed and FIFA’s interference with geographical qualification leagues is hindering the quality of the tournament which is famous for sporting the best teams and players in the entire world. With Dimitar Berbatov, Zlatan Ibrahimovic and Petr Cech absent, should the qualification process be reassessed? I defiantly feel there is room for improvement.
With such a lack of quality in that group, it was time for the “group of death”, group G, to display their unquestionable talent and their right for a presence in South Africa, perhaps with the omission of North Korea. Arguably the best African side, Ivory Coast, were hit with a group including Brazil and Portugal, diminishing their favourable chances of progressing to an honourable stage of the tournament. With the appointment of Sven Goran-Eriksson as manager, the Ivorians’ hopes were instantly raised and despite a potentially fatal blow in the form of an arm fracture for the incredibly powerful, talismanic hit man, Didier Drogba, the Africans played better than they were given credit for.
Drogba was handed a place amongst the substitutes but Ivory Coast still managed to field an impressive side including the Toure brothers, Salomon Kalou and the particularly credible, Gervinho. A typical Eriksson display limited the Portuguese to only one satisfying attempt in the form of some Cristiano Ronaldo magic as the outstanding player produced a neat turn and distant snap-shot resulting in the woodwork. It was mainly the Africans who flaunted an undeniable urgency, rarely visible in the dull nature of this tournament’s competition by causing the majority of the problems.
Drogba’s passion could not be questioned as he appeared, constantly animated from the sidelines and he was finally allowed to join the game with twenty-five minutes remaining. His involvement was minimal as all his team-mates appeared to be aware of his unfortunate situation and intended to save his brilliance for other games, with a point seemingly, already gained from a disappointingly sedate European team. However; Drogba did make sure his presence was respected with an outstretching leg to send the ball agonizingly wide on one occasion, but it was obvious that this is the best African team and could, in my opinion, be a real contender for the title if they manage to sneak out of their difficult group as the improbable advancers.
Attention now turns to the world cup’s most successful nation, Brazil. Against an unassuming North Korean side, it’s likely this unusually solid side of Brazil’s, still containing the predictable flair, skill and brilliance of always will do their best to dismantle, devour and destroy the Koreans. But football is made for moments like this and it could be quite a moment of national pride if the underdogs manage an unlikely draw or even an inconceivable victory.

Why football should employ a salary cap

As Premiership clubs are warned about their wage structures and recent statistics reveal that top flight clubs were spending around 1.3 billion on player wages even before Manchester City’s big-spending summer, we are yet again faced with the inevitable, yet predictable question; should football have a salary cap? The sport seems to have taken one step to far in recent times with irresponsible, uneducated footballers such as John Terry and Ashley Cole making publicly visible life errors and arguably, mediocre players such as Kieron Dyer and Michael Ballack remaining on astronomical wages. Unless you’re as deluded as the Chelsea left-back’s women judgement, the answer is a categorical yes.
Clubs such as West Ham, Crystal Palace and most notably Portsmouth have been placed in severe danger of ceasing to exist completely; an eventual state which would be a bloodcurdling disaster for staunch supporters. Fans will loose their love, which they have cherished throughout generations and the integrity of the sport will suffer a major dent if clubs with any form of history and heritage begin to disappear off of the face of the earth. The reason for this; astronomical wages which are financially crippling clubs with any kind of ambition. More and more foreign owners are breaking into the premiership toy shop, playing with a club, demanding instant success, handing out ridiculous contracts to playing staff; and if all goes wrong? They simply walk away, find something new to play with and leave the broken toy waiting for a saviour, reminiscent of David Gold and David Sullivan picking up the pieces at West Ham after the outlandish, unsustainable Icelandic era, fronted by Eggert Magnusson - and as debt increases, less of these heroic figures are going to be able to save the plight of doomed clubs.
The job of a footballer requires little responsibility - as doctors, nurses and soldiers struggle to stay out of the red, these uneducated fools are splashing out on Bentleys without a care in the world - how can this be logical? When these men and women fight for our country and save our lives, it seems staggering that a young man who kicks a ball around for 90 minutes on a weekend can get paid double in a week in comparison to what these high-profile professions earn in a whole year. A salary cap must be enforced.
As a casual fan of America’s NFL, it’s obvious this system has worked wonders in making their league one of the best domestic sport leagues in history to date. Every year holds an exciting race for the Superbowl title, with even games, competitive players and eventually an unpredictable champion. It’s a tried and tested method. It’s worked extremely effectively; so why not use it?
However; I must stress that I’m only in favour of the salary cap it it’s enforced on a global basis by FIFA. Players would simply request transfers abroad if nations such as Germany, Italy or Spain had no wage restrictions and this would degrade the quality of the league completely, turning the English premiership from what I believe is the greatest football league in the world to a mediocre campaign.
You may argue that if a club has money, why shouldn’t they be able to spend it? That’s why giving each club a unique salary cap based on their turnover is a rational option - this would mean large clubs such as Manchester United, who work hard on increasing their stature throughout the world and make colossal sums each year from selling their brand would have the ability to hand out bigger contracts than the likes of say, Wigan Athletic, who obviously don’t make anywhere near the same profit as United. As success breeds popularity, each club would strive to reach the top in order to make money and gain a lenient salary cap, meaning clubs would be unable the simply buy success and would have to gain stature naturally before being able to spend titanic sums of money in order to sustain their success.
Of course there is the argument that with foreign owners giving mammoth wages to English residents, the taxes are coming back into the country. But, with the economy in the dire state it is, these taxes obviously aren’t doing much good. The reality is, the government will always spend out of their means, no matter how much money is coming into the country. Footballers taxes appear relatively ineffectual at this current state, so why not change it? Football will provide it’s fair share of money for the country anyway if is able to win the 2018 world cup bid.
Yes; football gives an opportunity for the middle-class to earn big money and achieve a dream of being ‘rich’, but, in this respect, football is more of a distraction from education than a realistic, potential career. An extremely limited amount of hopefuls make it as a professional, so if gullible youngsters unrealistically believe they can be the next boy wonder, their education could suffer through lack of caring and a poor attitude under the belief they don’t need the qualifications. If wages were capped, perhaps these students would work harder on their studies rather than following the “£” signs provided by football. For the uneducated boys who actually do move into the game, role model status is instantly their, as idols to thousands, a huge number of kids aspire to be like these players because of the money they earn. If they didn’t receive such obscene amounts, perhaps more suitable role-models would be selected such as attainable jobs like doctors and lawyers.
Obviously I am in complete favour of a global salary cap for football, it will keep the clubs safe, the supporters happy and take the game back to what it originally was - a working man’s game and no longer a corporate monster which sucks all the fun out of a game which is, after all; entertainment.

Fans already suffer injuries in South Africa; why they should never have got the world cup and England must host the 2018 tournament

Worrying news from South Africa’s warm-up game consists of 14 fans being injured in another crowd crushing incident. Suggestions of another potential tragedy, reminiscent of the Hillsborough disaster will soon rise to the surface of the media and yet again South Africa’s ability to host a successful, and most importantly, safe world cup is yet again cast in doubt.
Terrorist attacks are a distinct possibility in this particular world cup and following the attack on Togo’s team bus during the African Cup Of Nations recently, it appears it’s not only the fans who are in danger. Fans are being advised on where not to go during hours of darkness due to car theft and shootings; clearly this world cup has the potential to be an absolute disaster.
Admittedly it’s refreshing for an African nation to host the world cup, and if you had to choose one it would have to be South Africa. They’re certainly the more developed country of the continent and have experience in hosting sporting events from the 1995 rugby world cup and the 2003 cricket world cup but the football world cup is on a whole different level and FIFA have taken a major gamble in allowing it to be held in a politically unstable, economically weak, third world country.
I’m sure the tournament will help to bring in large amounts of money for South Africa to develop into a prosperous region, but remarkably slow ticket sales in terms of a tournament as distinguished as the world cup due to inflated prices will certainly be worrying the organisers. Before their bid was successful, the country was in absolutely no position, in terms of hotels, roads, airports and most importantly stadiums to host an event of the FIFA World Cup’s monstrous nature and so billions of dollars have been pumped into the country making this the most expensive world cup to date.
The harsh reality of this glamorous tournament is, it could destroy the profile of South Africa as a tourist attraction rather than raise it if some form of disaster did take place (and that is certainly not out of the question). And, as the sporting world gracefully drifts on with another world cup under it’s belt it could leave the country further crippled in financial mess. This inconsiderate risk taken by FIFA may pay off for South Africa, and hopefully it does, but it’s one that should not be taken again and that’s why England should defiantly be considered for the next world cup.
London could probably get away with hosting a world cup as a city, let alone the entire nation. With glamorous stadiums such as Wembley, Old Trafford and the Emirates already in place, the tournament would be of minimal cost to the country in comparison to it’s predecessors and has the potential to be one of the best ever.
Although the slanderous antics of Lord Triesman have hindered England’s chances I’m sure that FIFA president, Sepp Blatter will look beyond this fault and see how England is perfect as a host nation. Blatter has previously indicated he considers England as “the motherland of football” and suggested that World Cup 2018 will return to a European country. Along with this advantage England have the benefit of the prestigious face of David Beckham heading the campaign as well as the international appeal of our Premier League, it’s certainly a substantial offer and we have a great chance of winning the bid. Crowd-violence is unjustly, still associated with this country and the disgrace of the F.A. cup clash between West Ham and Millwall may have worsened England’s argument, but, if an appropriate degree of research is employed into England, the outsider will surely realise that hooliganism is practically non-existent in British football and is certainly a lesser threat to the tournament in comparison to South Africa’s general crime rate.
Russia, Holland and Spain are worthy opponents to England amongst other Asian countries but it must be obvious to everyone that England is defiantly a better option than South Africa ever was. With the infrastructure firmly in place, our country is waiting for an opportunity like this to help rebuild it’s economy, carry it out of recession and solidify England’s position amongst the elite in the world of football.