Showing posts with label david moyes. Show all posts
Showing posts with label david moyes. Show all posts
Sunday, 5 November 2017
Redknapp and Rio regime would bring identity back to West Ham
A couple of years ago Harry Redknapp put Rio Ferdinand’s name forward as a potential West Ham manager.
As ever with Harry, it wasn’t just a selfless pitch - this is a man who’s Twitter account says he’s ‘proper excited about Mobile Cryptocurrency!’. Not one to let a potential pay cheque pass him by, he said he’d go with Ferdinand to the club as director of football.
I’ve toyed with the idea of this partnership at the club for some time now, although with Redknapp as manager and Ferdinand as his assistant, and I think it is the solution we are now looking for.
Embracing his character flaws as personality quirks, I’ve long been a fan of Redknapp. It’s easy to get caught in the trap of thinking of him as a ‘wheeler dealer’ - although don’t tell him that - and to frame his career as one punctuated by leaning out of car windows, a cheeky pay day managing Jordan and his most recent failing at Birmingham, but just five years ago he was the man for the England job.
The FA shied away back then and Sam Allardyce’s acrimonious exit is probably illustrative of how a Redknapp reign could’ve ended too, but he truly earned the right to be favourite for the position. Mauricio Pochettino has transformed Tottenham Hotspur but it was Redknapp who picked them up from a similar position to where we currently sit and built the base from which Poch has sprung.
Redknapp gets players going, he gets the fans going, he’s clever in the transfer market and he plays a solid brand of football but also an attacking one. A fan of direct wingers, a maverick or two, a target man and a poacher, I think Harry could really do something with the likes of Michail Antonio, Andy Carroll, Chicharito and he may even be able to save the likes of Marko Arnautovic from becoming a very expensive flop.
He’s no Pep Guardiola-style philosopher but he does have a recognisable brand of football which we could all get behind. I’m not sure we want a Pep anyway. The fan behind me at the Liverpool game yesterday is unfortunately broadly representative of a fair few vocal Hammers and screeched ‘why are you passing it around!? Go forward!’ every time we played a bit of possession football, but then shouted ‘hoof!’ when we played it forward, summing up the directionless confusion which has already riddled our ground like a cancer.
Those negative fans, chasing this ‘West Ham way’ myth, frustrate me, but I do agree Slaven Bilic has to go. Whilst an honest and decent man, he has never shown any sign of an ideology and consequently we never impose ourselves on games. Redknapp would grab a game by the scruff of the neck and take it to the opposition in the intense way we are crying out for.
But the most important reason why I think Harry Redknapp would be a good fit is the fact he has his roots in our club. We are going through a clear identity crisis at the moment and walking away from that stadium towards the bright lights of John Lewis after each thrashing is leaving us in a very difficult place. Who are we anymore?
Redknapp knows who we are and, if not this ‘West Ham way’, I think he could bring the ‘West Ham feel’ back to the place.
While there are a significant numbers of doomsdayers, there are an admirable group of fans scraping around to make this place home, with grass roots initiatives from the new fanzine, to the boat events on the river, to the Hammers Social Club moving into trendy studios. Rather than rejecting the change they are gripping this new space and injecting it with ‘West Ham’.
Redknapp is someone who could engage with that process and like it or not, he is one of us. It makes sense to have a man at the helm who represents us and the club as we know it as we go through this struggle.
And I think having Ferdinand on-board would go some way to satisfying those who would inevitably turn their nose up at Redknapp as a manager of the past and, at 70 years-old, an appointment with no longevity.
Ferdinand is a classy operator, a modern man and would be an obvious heir to the throne. He’s the kind of statesman-like figure any owner would want representing the club on the national and international stage and, as perhaps our famous academy’s most esteemed graduate who went on to reach the pinnacle of the game, he has the rare trait of embodying both our club and raw, powerful success.
Ferdinand speaks intelligently as a pundit, is doing his coaching qualifications and Redknapp emphasises how he would regularly consult him as the pair were reunited at QPR towards the end of Rio’s playing career. He commands respect and, Redknapp aside, an upbringing under Tony Carr and the majority of his career under Sir Alex Ferguson will surely help his prospects.
There’s a lot of talk of a David Moyes and Phil Neville combination this morning - it’s a similar idea, but it’s Everton’s version. When we’re desperately clinging to our identity in a storm of total change, we need to be looking closer to our old home as we look to build our new one.
Follow me on Twitter @RichMaher93.
Sunday, 19 May 2013
Mourinho; Moyes; Allardyce
I have an
embarrassing image in my mind of Jeremy Nicholas innocently cueing a rapturous
round of applause for Sam Allardyce’s new contract this afternoon and instead
being met with a disgruntled mixture of jeers, boos and of course, a number of
justified cheers.
As
Allardyce’s second term in charge reaches a climax, it is fair to say he still
hasn’t won the support of everyone. That is despite an immediate return to the
Premier League, a trip to Wembley and a mid-table finish in the top flight.
Much like you
are probably bewilderedly wondering why Manchester City have dismissed Roberto
Mancini just one season after he snatched the league title from the red half of
Manchester, plenty of football fans will be scratching their heads for as to
why any Hammer could legitimately oppose Allardyce’s reign.
Whilst I am
not arguing Allardyce is an inflated, northern reincarnation of Pep Guardiola,
I do think that to suggest his style of football is far different from plenty
of other successful coaches is a myth.
Last Saturday
we were beaten comprehensively. Allardyce himself admitted that the players
looked distracted and has also stressed the need to improve away from home next
year. Thus we should hold back on whining about away form and give Sam a chance
to rectify it over the Summer. After all it was our home form which was
criticised last year and our away form celebrated. Some people have short
memories.
Apparently
Saturday’s game was one of Everton’s best performances of the season,
undoubtedly sparked by the emotional exit of David Moyes who will succeed Sir
Alex Ferguson at Old Trafford.
Moyes’ eleven
years at Everton are considered successful because they were stable. He has
managed to operate on a tight budget and still wedge the club firmly in amongst
the top seven. If Allardyce has already broke into the top ten in one year
(assuming we hold on to that place today) then what makes you think he cannot
replicate Moyes’ success?
It is also
important to remember that Moyes has been criticised in the past for similar to
reasons to why Allardyce has been. Brendan Rodgers, Steven Gerrard and even
Ferguson himself, the man who recommended Moyes as his heir, have labelled
Everton long-ball merchants.
With
reference to Marouane Fellaini in Manchester United’s game against Everton this
very season, Ferguson argued “it was just difficult to handle him when they
were knocking these balls up to him. He is a handful, a big, tall, gangly lad,
and they just lumped the ball forward to him, that's all they did”. Sound
familiar?
Fortunately
for Moyes, these jibes have been brushed off whereas for Allardyce, the label
has stuck like fluff to Velcro. This is probably because Moyes has become
somewhat of a media darling for the longevity of his time at Everton whereas
Allardyce will always be
associated with an unfashionable Bolton Wanderers
team.
![]() |
| Moyes' new 'image' at Man U |
When
questioned about these criticisms back in November, Moyes was unfazed. He
argued that “we are beginning to compete better against most of the top clubs
now so that’s perhaps why these things are being said. I’d sooner get that,
them having a dig, than people being nice about us because we’ve lost”.
Moyes makes a
valid point. West Ham went through a stage of being continually praised under
Gianfranco Zola, and whilst it was flattering, we were a far weaker and
unstable outfit back then. You must first become hard to beat in the
Premiership to earn the right to attack with fluidity.
Anyone who
saw Everton against us last Saturday, or at their best during the season, must
admit that they play an attractive style of football, and most importantly a
successful brand of football. However they set up for games very similarly to
us.
They have a
solid back four, two deep-lying central midfielders, two wingers, one striker and
a goal scorer sitting just behind him in the form of Fellaini (our Kevin Nolan).
The only difference between us and Everton is that Moyes has had the time to
acquire quality players and to have them play with each other regularly.
Allardyce is
in a fantastic position to do the same. In Andy Carroll we already have a
superior target-man to Victor Anichebe; if we can hold on to him we can work on
improving our squad to a similar standard.
As useful as
Joey O’Brien has been this season, Leighton Baines is obviously a better
attacking force. Similarly a goal-scoring winger in the form of Kevin Mirallas
was the difference between the sides on Saturday, he is far better than Ricardo
Vaz Te.
Allardyce has
admitted “we need better players” despite the fact that the squad is already
strong. If we support him and give him time to upgrade the team in a similar
manner to how Moyes has, we could be rewarded with a team regularly competing
in the top-half of the league.
Allardyce is
perhaps in a better situation than Moyes was as he has greater funding, the
prospect of a large new stadium and the attraction of London which is likely to
appeal to some transfer targets.
Another coach
likely to be plying his trade amongst the Premiership’s elite next year is
managerial superstar Jose Mourinho. Unlike Allardyce, when you think of
Mourinho, you do not think of the long-ball, you think of trophies, a
fashionable foreigner and ‘the special one’.
When compared
to English coaches, Mourinho’s career has been rather fortunate. It was
Mourinho’s short success at UniĆ£o de Leiria, a side now in the Portuguese third
division, along with his charisma, which convinced Porto to appoint him.
The English
equivalent of Porto would have undoubtedly looked abroad for their manager
whereas Portugese coaches have a greater chance of managing the major clubs in
their home nation. With just one year’s managerial experience Mourinho got the
Porto job; Allardyce had four smaller jobs before his eight-year spell at
Bolton but he was still inevitably leapfrogged by foreign coaches for the top
jobs.
In reality it
is the image of Mourinho which makes him so attractive to employers. He is
charismatic, lovingly arrogant and above all a winner. In just two years at
Porto, Mourinho was fortunate enough to inherit a good group of players and
dominate the Champions League in a particularly weak year. Porto eventually
overcame a distinctly average Monaco in the final and the rest is history.
I am not
trying to criticise Mourinho. I am just pointing out the opportunities he has
had in his career are because of his image and his nationality. If he was a
somewhat overweight, Worcestershire-born bloke named Sam I suspect his career
would’ve panned out extremely differently.
Mourinho is
actually extremely similar to Allardyce in terms of tactics. He is a pragmatist
and his teams are predominantly reactive rather than proactive, even when they
do include the likes of Cristiano Ronaldo as opposed to Kevin Nolan.
His favoured
4-2-3-1 is similar to the way Allardyce lines up as it can smoothly transform
into a 4-4-1-1, a 4-5-1 or a 4-2-1-3. These rapid transitions are the reason
that 4-4-2 is rarer in modern football; it is simply too rigid to adjust quickly
when a team wish to change the emphasis and speed of the game.
If Allardyce
hadn’t been alienated from so many other coaches via his reputation, perhaps he
would be better appreciated like Moyes. The fact is that Allardyce has become
an iconic image within the game, but he represents everything which has become
unfashionable.
Allardyce
represents the antithesis of the stylish manager, but in reality he may not be
so different. We should appreciate finishing the season in tenth position in
the capable hands of Allardyce and I hope next season is another one of many stable,
successful campaigns under his guidance.
Follow me on
Twitter @RichMaher93
Labels:
alex ferguson,
allardyce,
david moyes,
everton,
fellaini,
Jeremy Nicholas,
jose mourniho,
manchester united,
mirallas,
porto,
premiership,
sam allardyce,
west ham
Location:
London, UK
Wednesday, 15 February 2012
A Valentine's Day Massacre?

What an occasion it was last time we were here at Upton Park. With 10-men in the first 10 minutes it was possible to envisage us embarrassing ourselves and sinking without a trace; but the players really stepped up to prove that they are completely committed to West Ham United. And we can be equally proud of the behaviour of our fans, it was admittedly a tense atmosphere but there was an absence of trouble from start to finish.
In fact, I wouldn’t be surprised if there was more crime as a result of this fixture; domestic violence on men is likely to rocket. There’s obviously an old, grumpy, single man at the helm of the nPower Championship who chose the date for this game, so thanks a lot for that one mate, you created an awkward conversation for many of us.
For those of you lucky enough to have escaped Valentine’s Day duties to be here tonight, at least you have a romantic fixture on your hands. Finally we get the chance to take on Southampton, who have accompanied us in the automatic promotion spots for the majority of the season, in our home stadium, and can further stretch the gap which divides us.
If it wasn’t for Peterborough’s absolute inadequacy to compete at this level of football we could be in a much better situation. Because of their poor facilities, last weekend’s game was postponed which means we were unable to maintain our 4 point safety net over the Saints. Fortunately for Southampton, their game was in their hands rather than that of an incompetent club, and so they now have the momentum and the opportunity to overtake us. But I’m confident we can handle the pressure.
Despite arguably being the Championship’s biggest game thus far, media attention has been greatly reduced due to the relentless coverage of the England manager’s vacancy. As an Englishman I’m delighted that Fabio Capello has resigned. It still baffles me as to why, in a world where two billion people can speak English, we chose someone who couldn’t to manage England’s national football team.
Hopefully the FA can make a better choice this time as, with Capello out of the picture, I am far more excited for the European Championships in the summer. It is almost inconceivable to imagine anyone other than Harry Redknapp taking over now as it seems inevitable that he will be offered the job.
I think Redknapp would be a good England manager but the main thing for us Hammers is that none of the job changes affect Sam Allardyce’s position. If Redknapp takes the England job, David Moyes could be appointed at Spurs and you might have Everton knocking on our door for ‘Big Sam’, what a disaster that would be.
I know there is still a minority of cynical West Ham fans who would still, ludicrously, welcome Sam’s departure, but if we emerge victorious today it must surely convince the remaining doubters that he has been an outstanding success. If we lose today, our fortunes could reverse as drastically as Redknapp’s did last Wednesday, when he was on his way to prison in the morning and on his way to managing his country in the evening; that is how important today’s game is.
The ideal outcome for West Ham would probably be the simple scenario of Jose Mourinho getting the national job, thereby avoiding the managerial merry-go-round which a Premier League appointment would entail; I can’t see Real Madrid looking to Allardyce as a replacement. This situation is not completely out of the question as I wouldn’t blame Harry for rejecting the job and remaining at White Hart Lane.
Redknapp has built the best squad he has had in his entire career at Tottenham and they are at the perfect age to continue to flourish if they remain loyal. It would be a great shame to throw that away. And looking at the manner in which the media have pounced on Stuart Pearce already, chastising him for something he said 18 years ago and his brother’s political views, why would you swap a job which you are doing fantastically in, for one with such intense pressure?
However, I personally think Redknapp will take the job, he seems to be one of the last old-fashioned, English managers to whom the national job probably still means more than a Premiership one. It wouldn’t surprise me if Spurs declared an interest in Allardyce, just in an effort to unsettle him; they love being a thorn in our side. But they may have already identified his replacement; did anyone see the photo of Avram Grant at the Tottenham training ground on Thursday? Now that would be funny!
With all of this speculation aside, our main concern is today’s game. I’m glad it’s come in the form of an evening game, even if it has fallen on an awkward date. A top of the table clash under the floodlights at Upton Park is something we haven’t experienced enough in recent years. It would be nice to get a glimpse of Ravel Morrison who has already been labelled a ‘homophobe’ by the media. For anyone who didn’t see it, the story was probably written by the same desperate journalist who called Stuart Pearce racist; needless criticism.
It will also be exciting to see our other signings who will probably feature sooner than Morrison. I hope we start with Nicky Maynard up front tonight, supported Ricardo Vaz Te on the wing so we can really attack Southampton in a Valentine’s Day massacre. Come on you Irons!
Follow me on Twitter @RichMaher93
Labels:
allardyce,
david moyes,
england,
nicky maynard,
ravel morrison,
redknapp,
west ham
Wednesday, 4 May 2011
West Ham vs. Blackburn Preview

It’s quite absurd as to how Avram Grant remains in a premier league job. Now, even Osama bin Laden has been terminated before Grant’s contract. The American authorities had searched tirelessly for almost ten years before finally tracking down their target, whilst Grant has been on show at Upton Park for the last nine months, sporting an embarrassing league record of a mere 20% win ratio, must we remind our owners that they have the ability to eliminate him? Perhaps in bin Laden’s killer we have finally found someone more ruthless than the acrimonious Karen Brady.
British football experts continually convince English clubs that they must continually adhere to the manager they have appointed, stating the few obvious case studies of David Moyes, Arsene Wenger and most notably Sir Alex Ferguson as examples of the fruits of long-term leadership. What they fail to recognise in the case of West Ham United is that, instead of appointing a young, enthusiastic, inspiring candidate wielding previous honours and success, such as that of the three names mentioned above, our owners somehow saw it fit to employ the dull, inadequate and recently relegated; Avram Grant.
It seemed rather strange of David Gold, at the time of the appointment, to describe Grant as someone who had “been there, done that and got the T-shirt”, when in fact, his Portsmouth side, albeit with a points deduction, had already sunk into the second tier of English football. In fact, his record with Portsmouth was even worse than it currently is with West Ham, so to blame their relegation on this penalty would be ridiculous. David Sullivan also agreed with his co-owner at the time, claiming; “we have taken our time over this appointment and are certain we have got the right man”. Perhaps this is the perfect statement to epitomise how much our owners actually know about football.
At the time, Gold also added that “the bottom line is the relationship between the manager and the chairman is critical. In our case it’s two chairmen so it’s even more difficult as you need to have a relationship between three people”. It is now evident that what Gold actually meant by this statement is that by handing the position to an innocuous, lifeless excuse of a manager, there was enough room for him, and Sullivan, to squeeze their inflated egos onto the scene.
Prior to the Manchester City game, the frustratingly irritating Sullivan couldn’t resist the attention of opening his mouth once again by announcing that the Hammers only have a “25% chance of staying up” and labelling the players “spoilt”, claiming most of them are more interested in “where they will be next season” than keeping West Ham in the premiership. Sullivan certainly has a warped view of motivation if he believes deeming the players fickle mercenaries will give them the inspiration to battle for some much needed points.
And then, in an act of comical hypocrisy, Sullivan (and Gold) failed to show at the City Of Manchester Stadium, justifying their disloyal absence with the impact of “watching our poor away performances week after week”. If his comments were not rich enough, he went on to compare his motivational skills to that of Winston Churchill. It’s no wonder as to why he was unable to secure the services of an established, dignified manager in Martin O’Neill in January, as he continues to embarrass himself, and thus the club, with these sporadic outbursts.
It’s also worth noting that Sullivan stated; “I do think that a manager needs that fear factor. You look at Alex Ferguson, Arsene Wenger and Jose Mourinho. The players are a little bit frightened of them”. Obviously he completely ignored this belief when he appointed Grant as, with the omission of his eerily zombie-like demeanour, he would fail to strike fear, or any emotion for that matter, into anyone.
Even Demba Ba admitted that, in the brief February period in which we began to consistently win some games that “we had a new team … and other teams were surprised by us. Now they know how to counter us”. Clearly even Grant’s players recognise that he is tactically inadequate and that, even in the very few games he has won, it was not his ability as a manager but the fact he was able to spring a few new faces upon his opponent, before their traits were identified, assessed and countered by genuinely Premiership-quality managers, and it was back to square one.
Grant has tried to use this hopeless tactic all throughout the season, meaning West Ham have used more players than any other squad in the Premier League. Quite astounding considering the lack of depth in quality we have in some departments. Seeing Grant’s notebook fall apart and flutter around the pitch in Manchester last Sunday was quite symbolic of a man whose plans have completely crumbled. Seeing his hopeless attempt to collect them back together was perhaps even more significant in suggesting the lack of answers he has to the undeniable problems.
Seeing the emotion and joy on the faces of Norwich fans on Monday evening, following their promotion, sparked wonderful, nostalgic memories of our play-off success in 2005. However, it also provoked the epiphany of the immense value of premiership status, and the fact that at the moment, we are sickeningly throwing it away. Surely, whether he completes this demolition of another premiership club or not, Grant will be fired and disappear into the wilderness, as bin Laden did all those years ago. Inevitably he will never again have the chance to manage a premiership club, not that he was ever capable or worthy of doing so in the first place.
Grant’s career will be reflected on in bewilderment, as it was effectively based on absolutely nothing. However, I still believe that the team will remain in the premier league due to fortuitous fixtures, the incompetence of those around us and the personal brilliance of the likes of Scott Parker. That will leave us with yet another summer rebuilding job which must be done correctly this time. Where it leaves Grant is debatable, with a football director’s role rumoured to be lined up at Chelsea, he could unbelievably stroll into yet another lucrative contract. Grant’s secret is certainly beyond me, it’s certainly not his charisma or his ability, but as long as he’s nowhere near West Ham United next season, I’ll be a happier man, and so will 34,000 others.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)




