Rickie Lambert is not the answer for West Ham

The result against Watford was certainly a disappointing one although the performance was rather typical of how we have played throughout the season. We look solid at 0-0 and if we are to get a goal then you fancy that we will go on and win it; but we never look fierce enough to come back and win from a goal down. Against Doncaster, even our ability to hold on to the 1-0 lead faltered.

Sam Allardyce not only suggested that someone like Southampton’s Rickie Lambert would’ve won us the game, but would’ve won us the Championship already! Although there is no doubt that Lambert has been vital to Southampton this season and is a top player, this comment is an unfair insult to our strikers.

“Sticking the ball in the back of the net”, as Allardyce eloquently puts it, has been the main problem of late, but this is more due to the lack of clear-cut chances we are creating than poor strikers. Reflecting on both games, I can think of very few chances which I would’ve genuinely expected one of our strikers to finish.

Whatever you think of Carlton Cole, although he is not the greatest finisher, he has earned seven England caps and scored 40 goals for us over his time here, and so it is clear that Cole does have the ability, even if he does not always show it.

It has become quite a cliché that Cole is a ‘confidence player’ who thrives on encouragement, so Allardyce’s praise of his striking counterparts for other teams is unlikely to have a positive impact on his performances.

Similarly, Nicky Maynard obviously has the ability to score goals and is someone who I have wanted us to sign for a number of years. His first goal for the club against Blackpool exemplified the kind of close-range, instinctive finishes that we purchased him for. Since that goal, with the exception of a couple of chances at Cardiff, Maynard has rarely had the opportunity to score this kind of goal.

Playing Cole and Maynard up front together on Wednesday night looked like an exciting combination however the duo never really managed to show their capabilities. There was a clear lack of chemistry between the pair which can only be created over more time playing together; however, if the results with two strikers continue to be as fruitless as that, the ruthless nature of football means we will swiftly revert back to one up top.

With Maynard such a new addition, it is rather thoughtless of Allardyce to publicly commend Lambert, perhaps suggesting a hint of regret that he had to settle for Maynard instead. I would’ve encouraged Allardyce to give Maynard another chance to play alongside Cole against Doncaster as he needs to net a home goal to boost his confidence.

Sam Baldock, previously the forgotten man, has looked very lively when he has been brought on recently, however I don’t hesitate to suggest that when both are at their best, Maynard is the better player and the one more likely to adjust to the Premier League. However he needs time to become successful at West Ham in the Championship if he is to be able to make the step-up next year (assuming we gain promotion) and for success he needs goals, and for goals he needs chances.

This begs the question as to whether Allardyce should be looking to criticise his midfielders rather than his strikers. The reality is that Southampton have five players who have achieved more assists than West Ham’s highest entry, Matty Taylor with five.

There is no doubt that Allardyce has identified this and looked to sign Leeds winger Robert Snodgrass in January, who has created ten goals this season; but as his efforts have proved futile, he has shifted the blame to the attack.

Allardyce himself admits that Kevin Nolan is “not a midfield player-maker”, and with Mark Noble holding a very deep role in midfield, there is little to no creativity coming from the middle of the park. In terms of wingers, Julien Faubert has had a better season but still only delivers one in twenty of his crosses to a satisfactory standard and the new addition Ricardo Vaz Te is evidently more comfortable with a central role.

Our finest creative player is obviously Matt Taylor whose quality of delivery is unsurpassed by anyone else in our squad. However this is just as obvious to the opposition who look to close him down quickly and keep him as far away from the by-line as possible, meaning that his possession of the ball often climaxes with a shot from distance rather than a chance for the strikers.

You may have forgotten about Ravel Morrison, who signed for us in January from Manchester United upon a wave of excitement, as he has yet to get anywhere near the first team. However, despite concerns about his attitude, it could be time to draft him in to the starting eleven. It’s not possible that he could’ve offered anything less than Jack Collison did on Saturday.

Morrison has been labelled one of the best prospects to have been in Manchester United’s illustrious youth academy in recent years, and has been compared to Paul Scholes by those who have watched him. Having seen the effect that the return of Scholes has had on United’s performances, perhaps we should be looking to bring in Morrison in an effort to improve our own. After being abandoned by Sir Alex Ferguson, it is likely that Morrison’s fiery attitude will push him to prove Ferguson’s assessment that he is not worth the hassle to be wrong.

Additionally, we have players like Henri Lansbury who could operate in a more creative midfield role but have been forced into makeshift roles all over the field including right-wing, right-back and goalkeeper! Surely it is obvious as to why we are failing to create as many chances as we should be.

I’m no critic of Allardyce but I certainly feel that he should consider different things he could do with his own squad before complimenting the players of others. All his statement about Lambert is likely to do is give the Southampton striker added belief that he is better than our players and to score more goals to keep the Saints at the top of the league, and thus leave us trailing in second place.

Carlton Cole obviously didn’t react particularly well against Doncaster as his performance left much to be desired. Let’s hope we create more chances against Leeds and “stick the ball in the back of the net” as many times as possible, otherwise another winless game could give Reading the momentum to jump ahead of us in the automatic promotion spots.

Follow me on Twitter @RichMaher93

A Valentine's Day Massacre?

What an occasion it was last time we were here at Upton Park. With 10-men in the first 10 minutes it was possible to envisage us embarrassing ourselves and sinking without a trace; but the players really stepped up to prove that they are completely committed to West Ham United. And we can be equally proud of the behaviour of our fans, it was admittedly a tense atmosphere but there was an absence of trouble from start to finish.

In fact, I wouldn’t be surprised if there was more crime as a result of this fixture; domestic violence on men is likely to rocket. There’s obviously an old, grumpy, single man at the helm of the nPower Championship who chose the date for this game, so thanks a lot for that one mate, you created an awkward conversation for many of us.

For those of you lucky enough to have escaped Valentine’s Day duties to be here tonight, at least you have a romantic fixture on your hands. Finally we get the chance to take on Southampton, who have accompanied us in the automatic promotion spots for the majority of the season, in our home stadium, and can further stretch the gap which divides us.

If it wasn’t for Peterborough’s absolute inadequacy to compete at this level of football we could be in a much better situation. Because of their poor facilities, last weekend’s game was postponed which means we were unable to maintain our 4 point safety net over the Saints. Fortunately for Southampton, their game was in their hands rather than that of an incompetent club, and so they now have the momentum and the opportunity to overtake us. But I’m confident we can handle the pressure.

Despite arguably being the Championship’s biggest game thus far, media attention has been greatly reduced due to the relentless coverage of the England manager’s vacancy. As an Englishman I’m delighted that Fabio Capello has resigned. It still baffles me as to why, in a world where two billion people can speak English, we chose someone who couldn’t to manage England’s national football team.

Hopefully the FA can make a better choice this time as, with Capello out of the picture, I am far more excited for the European Championships in the summer. It is almost inconceivable to imagine anyone other than Harry Redknapp taking over now as it seems inevitable that he will be offered the job.

I think Redknapp would be a good England manager but the main thing for us Hammers is that none of the job changes affect Sam Allardyce’s position. If Redknapp takes the England job, David Moyes could be appointed at Spurs and you might have Everton knocking on our door for ‘Big Sam’, what a disaster that would be.

I know there is still a minority of cynical West Ham fans who would still, ludicrously, welcome Sam’s departure, but if we emerge victorious today it must surely convince the remaining doubters that he has been an outstanding success. If we lose today, our fortunes could reverse as drastically as Redknapp’s did last Wednesday, when he was on his way to prison in the morning and on his way to managing his country in the evening; that is how important today’s game is.

The ideal outcome for West Ham would probably be the simple scenario of Jose Mourinho getting the national job, thereby avoiding the managerial merry-go-round which a Premier League appointment would entail; I can’t see Real Madrid looking to Allardyce as a replacement. This situation is not completely out of the question as I wouldn’t blame Harry for rejecting the job and remaining at White Hart Lane.

Redknapp has built the best squad he has had in his entire career at Tottenham and they are at the perfect age to continue to flourish if they remain loyal. It would be a great shame to throw that away. And looking at the manner in which the media have pounced on Stuart Pearce already, chastising him for something he said 18 years ago and his brother’s political views, why would you swap a job which you are doing fantastically in, for one with such intense pressure?

However, I personally think Redknapp will take the job, he seems to be one of the last old-fashioned, English managers to whom the national job probably still means more than a Premiership one. It wouldn’t surprise me if Spurs declared an interest in Allardyce, just in an effort to unsettle him; they love being a thorn in our side. But they may have already identified his replacement; did anyone see the photo of Avram Grant at the Tottenham training ground on Thursday? Now that would be funny!

With all of this speculation aside, our main concern is today’s game. I’m glad it’s come in the form of an evening game, even if it has fallen on an awkward date. A top of the table clash under the floodlights at Upton Park is something we haven’t experienced enough in recent years. It would be nice to get a glimpse of Ravel Morrison who has already been labelled a ‘homophobe’ by the media. For anyone who didn’t see it, the story was probably written by the same desperate journalist who called Stuart Pearce racist; needless criticism.

It will also be exciting to see our other signings who will probably feature sooner than Morrison. I hope we start with Nicky Maynard up front tonight, supported Ricardo Vaz Te on the wing so we can really attack Southampton in a Valentine’s Day massacre. Come on you Irons!

Follow me on Twitter @RichMaher93

The Millwall game means nothing

With the intense anxiety surrounding our fixture against Millwall, I was posed with the question as to what it would actually mean for our fans to thrash the Lions. I have come to the conclusion, that in the grand scheme of things, it means little more than an ordinary game.

Whilst Millwall have not entered the top tier of English football for over two decades, the majority of West Ham’s recent history has either been spent there or vying to return there. Although I will be accused of being a biased West Ham fan, I think we can safely say that the Hammers are a far bigger club.

Modern history has seen us develop a more relevant rivalry with Tottenham Hotspur, a club which has been in the same division as us far more often and who we have had arguably more fracases with, the latest being the battle for the Olympic Stadium. When we beat Tottenham I am filled with an immense sense of pride and relish the next, inevitably, boastful encounter I will have with a Spurs fan; when we beat Millwall it is more a sense of relief.

Whilst both clubs have had their own aims to focus on, West Ham’s being promotion and Millwall’s towards the other end of the table, eyes have certainly been drawn to this game, whether it is with eagerness or caution. The initial leg played at the Den resulted in a dull 0-0, but of course the main thing to report was an impressive lack of crowd violence.

The rivalry between West Ham and Millwall has become so warped by popular culture and Danny Dyer’s everlasting list of football ‘firm’ films that the violence which was synonymous with 1980s hooliganism shamefully returned to the surface just three years ago. Strangely, the match between the sides at Upton Park in 2004 and even in the corresponding fixture earlier this season have passed by without incident. So what was different about the infamous meeting in 2009?

Quite simply, being a League Cup match which was not included on the season ticket, much of the ground was not filled with genuine Hammers’ fans but with rowdy idiots who purchased tickets to the match with the sole intention of re-creating the violent rivalry which has been advertised through cinema in recent years.

Although these topless yobs on the pitch may have had hammers imprinted on their skin, a real West Ham supporter would care more about our reputation and the negative repercussions the club could face rather than shattering a Millwall fan’s cheekbone.

Whilst the banter of healthy rivalry is integral to the character of football as a whole, seeing it resort to mindless violence undermines the whole purpose of the game which is, ultimately to entertain. Thanks to the outrageous scenes of the last meeting between the two clubs at Upton Park, alcohol is banned within a surrounding proximity of the Boleyn Ground and many parents have refused to take their children to the match, this affects the way in which a huge amount of people want to enjoy football.

The absurdity of wanting to injure, or even kill, another man on the basis of who he wants to win a game of football is almost incomprehensible when you look at it in that way. Many of these stupid thugs don’t even know why they are attacking the man opposite them; it is simply “because he supports Millwall!”

In truth the rivalry originates from when Thames Ironworks were placed on the opposite side of the River Thames to Millwall’s founding company and put in direct competition with them. It is easy to see why, when both companies decided to form football teams, it was always a fierce encounter.

However a fiery competition on the pitch is completely different to hundreds of grown-men lobbing glass at each other over. I hope it does get heated on the pitch this Saturday as that is the best and most entertaining way to respect this historic rivalry, not by fighting other fans.

The main thing for real West Ham fans is that we pick ourselves up from a shocking 5-1 defeat to Ipswich in the week and remain on course to win the Championship. We are excited to see the new signings Ricardo Vaz Te, Ravel Morrison and Nicky Maynard add some much needed pace and flair to our football; we do not want to see pathetic old men or ignorant troublemakers trying to cling onto a shameful period of football’s past.

It would mean an enormous amount for Hammers’ fans to see an exciting and passionate game of football in which West Ham emerge victors, but not because of the regretful connotations of this fixture. It would mean so much because it would prove that the players actually care about West Ham United, a matter of debate with regards to Tuesday night, and would push us a step closer to returning to where we belong.